Trinidad Chambliss
- austinbignall07
- Dec 28, 2025
- 3 min read

NFL Draft Profile: Trinidad Chambliss
Position: Quarterback | School: Mississippi (Ole Miss) | Class: Senior
Height: 6'1" | Weight: 200 lbs | Archetype: Dual-Threat
Career Summary
Trinidad Chambliss is the definitive underdog story of the 2025 season. A transfer from Division II power Ferris State, Chambliss arrived in Oxford as a little-known depth piece behind Austin Simmons. Following an early-season injury to Simmons, Chambliss stepped into the spotlight and authored a historic rise, leading Ole Miss to a 10-1 regular-season record and several marquee SEC upsets.
Chambliss brought a championship pedigree to the Rebels, having led Ferris State to a D-II National Title in 2024. His transition to the SEC was seamless; he became the first quarterback in conference history to record 300+ passing yards and 50+ rushing yards in three consecutive games. He capped off his 2025 regular season by winning the Conerly Trophy (best player in Mississippi) and earning SEC Newcomer of the Year honors.
2025 Regular Season Stats
Passing Yards: 3,298
Completion %: 66.6%
Passing TDs: 19
Interceptions: 3
Rushing Yards: 506
Rushing TDs: 8
2025 Game-by-Game Grades
Week | Opponent | Stats (Cmp/Att, Yds, TD/INT) | Grade | Scout's Notes |
1 | vs Arkansas | 21/29, 353 Yds, 1 TD/0 INT | A+ | The Breakout. Totaled 415 offensive yards in his first career FBS start. |
2 | vs Tulane | 17/27, 307 Yds, 2 TD/0 INT | A | Showed elite deep-ball precision; added 112 yards and 2 TDs on the ground. |
3 | vs #4 LSU | 23/39, 314 Yds, 1 TD/1 INT | A- | The Upset. Delivered a clutch 4th-down strike late to seal the 24-19 win. |
4 | vs Washington St | 20/29, 253 Yds, 2 TD/0 INT | B+ | Highly efficient; successfully navigated a complex defensive scheme. |
5 | @ Georgia | 19/36, 263 Yds, 1 TD/0 INT | B | Battled elite speed. Used his legs (2 rushing TDs) to keep the game close. |
6 | @ Oklahoma | 24/44, 315 Yds, 1 TD/0 INT | B+ | High-volume day. Handled the hostile road environment with veteran poise. |
7 | vs South Carolina | 12/21, 159 Yds, 1 TD/1 INT | C+ | A rare sluggish performance; production was limited by a heavy pass rush. |
8 | vs The Citadel | 29/33, 333 Yds, 3 TD/0 INT | A | Nearly perfect (87.9%). Total command of Lane Kiffin’s vertical concepts. |
9 | vs Florida | 26/35, 301 Yds, 1 TD/1 INT | B | Solid yardage but forced one throw into double coverage. |
10 | @ Mississippi St | 23/34, 359 Yds, 4 TD/0 INT | A+ | Egg Bowl Masterclass. Clinical destruction of the rival secondary. |
NFL Scouting Report
Strengths
Exceptional Feel & Poise: Despite his D-II background, the "moment" is never too big for him. He plays with an "ice in the veins" temperament in high-stakes situations.
Vertical Accuracy: Chambliss excels in Lane Kiffin’s vertical passing game. He has elite touch on double-moves and "bucket" throws down the sideline.
Dynamic Mobility: A true dual-threat with basketball-player agility. He uses vision and acceleration to turn broken plays into 20+ yard gains.
Ball Security: An incredibly efficient decision-maker. Throwing only 3 interceptions across 362 attempts in the SEC is an elite statistical indicator of NFL readiness.
Weaknesses
Undersized Frame: At 6'1", 200 lbs, he does not fit the "eye test" for traditional NFL pocket passers. There are concerns about his durability under NFL-level hits.
Arm Strength Ceiling: While accurate, he lacks the "elite" velocity to drive the ball into tight windows against top-tier NFL man coverage.
Late Bloomer: Scouts question if his 2025 production is a product of Lane Kiffin’s QB-friendly system or sustainable individual talent.
Scout's Final Word
"Trinidad Chambliss is the ultimate wildcard of the 2026 class. He is a natural playmaker who has proven that size is not a barrier to SEC dominance. His ability to process quickly and protect the football makes him an ideal developmental prospect. He may not be a Day 1 starter, but his 'winner' traits and mobility give him a high ceiling as a high-end backup or eventual starter."
Draft Projection: Mid-Round (Round 4–5)









Comments